Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Gaming Operator Kindred Faces $42M Fine If It Doesn’t Leave Norway editorial policy.
  1. Nevada Casinos Set Monthly Slot Record, but Overall Win Down in October

Compare Accounts
×
Spanish Soccer’s Tendering Process for Betting Streaming Rights Comes Under Fire
Provider
Name
Description
Alabama Exits College Football Title Race; LSU, OSU, and Clemson Now the Three Heavy Favorites  VEGAS RESTAURANT ROUNDUP: Bellagio Closing Julian Serrano’s Picasso, José Andrés Opening 5th Strip Eatery  Taxi Fares to EDC Music Festival in Vegas May Be Even Higher than Some Attendees  California Sports Betting Vote Unlikely Before 2026, Mobile Further Out  Las Vegas COVID-19 Cases Increasing, Respiratory Ailments Striking Kids  Mexican Preschool Wins Lottery, Gets Menaced by Paramilitaries  Commercial Gaming Industry Sets Quarterly Record, as Players Lose Nearly $18B  Sports Gambling Hall of Fame to Induct Mob Associate Lefty Rosenthal  Governors Order Atlantic City and New York Casinos to Close, Urge Connecticut Tribal Venues to Follow Suit  Silver Sevens Casino in Las Vegas Set for Major Renovation, Rebrand